[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-Disclosure] OT: Hamilton v. Microsoft lawsuit complaint is now online

Even at this very late date, I'm still compelled to say:

On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 12:16:26PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> Richard M. Smith wrote:
> 
> > I have posted a copy of the Hamilton v. Microsoft law 
> > suit complaint on my Web site:
> > 
> > http://www.computerbytesman.com/security/hamilton_v_microsoft_complaint.htm
> > 
> > This Reuters story provides background on this proposed 
> > class action lawsuit, which was filed today in Los Angeles, 
> > against Microsoft:
> > 
> >    Microsoft faces class action on security
> >    http://news.com.com/2100-1009-5085730.html?tag=nl
> 
> Quite offtopic. But what I still wonder is why the heck one
> isn't allowed to do business and become large.
> Is it all jealousy? If they where so bad why do they get
> the revenue and not your company producing super duper software?

/* snip */


Don't feed the trolls...




- John
-- 
"Warning: time of day goes back, taking countermeasures."
-
John Sage; InfoSec Groupie
-
ABCD, EFGH, IJKL, EmEnOh, Pplus+, Mminus-
-
ATTENTION: this message is privileged communication. If you read it
even though you aren't supposed to, you're a poopy-head.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html