Re: [Full-Disclosure] NINCOMPOOPERY OF MICROSOFT

[Georgi Guninski <guninski@guninski.com>]

This user Bullmur should be carefull with the word "criminal".

Question to the lawyers on the list:
It is my understanding that "criminal" is someone who breaks the law.
microsoft seem to have been found guilty by a court in the antitrust trial, so 
they seem to have broken the law.

Are microsoft criminals from legal point of view?

Or does justice work this way: if you deface a website, you are a criminal, but 
if you screw most of the internet you are a hero?

georgi



On Wed,  1 Oct 2003 07:54:12 -0700
<dhtml@hush.com> wrote:

> "Hackers are criminals" Most, he notes, release their malicious code
> after patches for Microsoft software have been released, meaning that
> they are simply reverse engineering to exploit security weaknesses or
> holes in software. - Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer 
> 
> 'ninkum`poop [n]  a stupid foolish person See Also: simple, simpleton
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html