Re: [Full-Disclosure] More on Dan Geer

["Keith W. McCammon" <keith-list@mccammon.org>]

And with that I certainly agree.  However, the unfortunate result in 
cases such as this, is that everyone suffers indirectly, even though 
they are obviously removed from the action.

It would be nice if the clowns at @stake responsible for this would just 
 take themselves quietly out of the loop, in the same manner as was 
done to someone else...

madsaxon wrote:
> At 12:32 PM 9/30/03 -0400, Keith W. McCammon wrote:
>
> > A corporate entity is just a collection of individuals.  And in this 
> > case, those individuals have (it seems) a great deal of influence 
> > within that entity.  Thus, for the purposes of this argument, the two 
> > can be treated almost interchangeably.
>
>
> OK, let me phrase it a different way.  I know some of the people
> involved, even at the higher levels of the corporation, who
> don't share in the official @Stake stance.  In the same way
> that I don't necessarily blame Microsoft's employees for the
> decisions of Gates, et al., I don't want to see everyone at @Stake
> automatically crucified for this unfortunate action.
>
> m5x
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html