[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Prudent default security
- To: "Full Disclosure" <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Prudent default security
- From: "Schmehl, Paul L" <pauls@utdallas.edu>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:20:03 -0500
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Wray [mailto:steve.wray@paradise.net.nz]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:58 AM
> To: 'Full Disclosure'
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Prudent default security -
> Was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly
>
> I know that there are some nice tools for doing remote and bulk admin
> for the latest iterations of the Windows operating system,
> but from what I've seen, they lack maturity and often cause
> more trouble than they help prevent (DCOM? Am I right? Does
> anyone leave remote registry on?)
>
Steve, you should stop now. Your embarassing lack of knowledge of
Windows is all too obvious.
Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html