[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Pudent default security - Was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly
- To: Steve Wray <steve.wray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Pudent default security - Was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly
- From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:05:12 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Steve Wray wrote:
> There is if you don't use a windowing operating system; this is
> precisely what my team is doing for a very large collection of
> firewalled boxes, remotely administered and their forewall
> configurations all maintained and audited by remote control and en masse
> to boot.
Oh please... We are talking about desktop environments and LAN "blob
networks"... and Windows is on almost every desktop. If you work for a
company that either never used this system, or could easily migrate to
another system that works better for them, consider yourself very lucky.
In such a case, you do have powerful remote control, backup, auditing and
maintenance tools, and it's easy to come up with a solution that suits you
best. On Windows, however, it takes some serious work to do the same, and
it's often cheaper to buy a product that has the same functionality and a
nice GUI.
--
------------------------- bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --
Michal Zalewski * [http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx]
Did you know that clones never use mirrors?
--------------------------- 2003-09-30 10:59 --
http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/photo/current/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html