[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws
- To: <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws
- From: "Schmehl, Paul L" <pauls@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:32:30 -0500
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Flynn [mailto:flynngn@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 8:06 AM
> To: 'full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC
> worm for Windo ws
>
>
> I would think a better way of determining if a patch is
> actually installed on a system is by examining the files on
> the system rather than to depend upon symptoms (scanners) or
> installation logs (registry entries).
True, but *I'm* not going to physically touch (or even virtually touch)
2000+ machines looking at file properties. Are you?
Paul Schmehl (pauls@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html