[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] BugTraq Speed
- To: "Henrik Edlund" <henrik@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Rainer Gerhards" <rgerhards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] BugTraq Speed
- From: "Rapaille Max" <Max.Rapaille@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 08:41:02 +0200
I can confirm too.
For Example : Mail from Oliver Heinz (Arago.de) about Gauntlet firewall DOS :
Received 24 September at 16.01 (GMT-1) from Full-Disclosure and received at
22.32 (GMT-1) from Bugtraq...
Or do I need to assume a voluntary delay from the author??? I doubt.
CHeers
Max
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Edlund [mailto:henrik@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: mercredi 24 septembre 2003 21:55
> To: Rainer Gerhards
> Cc: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] BugTraq Speed
> Sensitivity: Private
>
>
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
>
> RG> I wonder if someone else is sharing this experience? If
> so, one would be
> RG> tempted to suspect that Symantec is deliberately delaying
> delivery, e.g.
>
> I can confirm a delay of 3-12 hours on BUGTRAQ compared to this list.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
Visit our website! http://www.nbb.be
"DISCLAIMER: The content of this e-mail message should not be construed as
binding on the part of the National Bank of Belgium (NBB) unless otherwise and
previously stated. The opinions expressed in this message are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect NBB viewpoints, particularly when the
content of this message, or part thereof, is private by nature or does not fall
within the professional scope of its author."