Re: [Full-Disclosure] BugTraq Speed

[Michael Ablassmeier <abi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

hi Rainer,

On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:39:27PM +0200, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> I wonder if someone else is sharing this experience? If so, one would be
> tempted to suspect that Symantec is deliberately delaying delivery, e.g.
> to give its premium customers a head start. There have been a lot of
> rumors recently, and this would fit in nicely...

i almost can share this experience with you. I've unsubscribed Bugraq a
few weeks ago, because i think, this list is better to discuss things, 
even if they are not <only> security related. I did not keep an eye on
every flaw which was reported, but sometimes, it seems indeed that f-d is 
more reliable (faster). Hm. This should not become an Bugraq vs. f-d
flame ;-)

bye,
    - michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/cf7YEFV7g4B8rCURAgZZAJ9VBSoHMxXx1lWNucy8afx+RAiZWwCgzUKo
u2kRZEvVASUXcM6f9J9v4gM=
=O3/G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html