On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:57:02 PDT, Jeremiah Cornelius said: > On Tuesday 23 September 2003 15:12, Vinadvertentlyks@xxxxxx wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 13:15:05 PDT, Jeremiah Cornelius said: > > > Sounds like a case for DMCA violation to me... > > And the copy-protection technology that was circumvented was what, exactly? > Sorry. The subtle <smirk> tags were inadvertantly left from my message... Oh darn. I was *so* hoping that the original file was in a password-protected .ZIP file or something - even ROT13 would have been enough, as Skylarov found out. If there HAD been a DMCA issue, the lawyers would get rich, and the bystanders would be well entertained. It would have been interesting seeing how a John Doe plaintiff quantified damages in a copyright suit... ;)
Attachment:
pgp00067.pgp
Description: PGP signature