[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] New Hacking Zine: p62 (formatting corrected)
- To: Joshua Levitsky <jlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] New Hacking Zine: p62 (formatting corrected)
- From: "Gregory A. Gilliss" <ggilliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:37:46 -0700
Darn - what's the world coming to when Phrack needs to PGP sign their
e-zine? <LOL>
G
On or about 2003.09.23 11:13:48 +0000, Joshua Levitsky (jlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx)
said:
> Would be nice if they used a PGP / GPG key. Would make it easy then if
> they signed the documents. Then if the documents were tampered, or not
> official then it would be reflected by the signature not matching or
> the key not being right. Then nobody could say anything about a Phrack
> being valid or not. Might make things easier and make for less arguing.
--
Gregory A. Gilliss, CISSP Telephone: 1 650 872 2420
Computer Engineering E-mail: greg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Computer Security ICQ: 123710561
Software Development WWW: http://www.gilliss.com/greg/
PGP Key fingerprint 2F 0B 70 AE 5F 8E 71 7A 2D 86 52 BA B7 83 D9 B4 14 0E 8C A3
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html