[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Is Marty Lying?
- To: Blue Boar <BlueBoar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Is Marty Lying?
- From: security snot <booger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
For you, yes.
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Whitehat by day, booger at night - I'm the security snot."
- CISSP / CCNA / A+ Certified - www.unixclan.net/~booger/ -
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Blue Boar wrote:
> security snot wrote:
> > The "code audit" that you guys did to make sure nothing was backdoored was
> > quite thorough too, considering since then remote bugs in Snort have been
> > published. If you can't even spot the vulnerable code you introduce into
> > your source tree by accident, how can you definitively argue that no one
> > else snuck in subtle bugs that you also didn't catch?
>
> I'm sure it would have been extraordinarily difficult to run 'diff' on
> the codebase before the intrusion and the one after, to see if any of
> the changes weren't accounted for.
>
> BB
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html