[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] New port 901 scans?
- To: "John Pavlakis" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "J. Race" <caferace@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] New port 901 scans?
- From: "morning_wood" <se_cur_ity@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 12:03:04 +0530
this is a fxing joke "http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?date=2003-06-04"
netdevil is authored by nilez, and is not "new" by any means.
the standard packer is "upx" and no updates are planned
why cant they get thier info straight *sigh*
if any one wants a uncompressed server or a totaly undetected version of the
server for testing i may be willing to provide info for forensics.
features are notification by cgi, mail and ICQ ( broke )
includes offline keylogging and webcam features.
Donnie Werner
CTO e2-labs.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Pavlakis" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "J. Race" <caferace@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] New port 901 scans?
> http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?date=2003-06-04
>
>
>
> > I'm seeing an increase in port 901 scans this morning starting a little
> > over 3 hours ago, all from individual IP's outside my netblock
> > originating from random ports.
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html