Re: [Full-Disclosure] idea

[John Sage <jsage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Too late!

On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:39:07PM -0700, D B wrote:
> correct ....
> 
> with an encryption layer that obscures the data so the
> next "freq" isnt tattletailed thus making it hard to
> know which packets are part of the actual data and
> which are controlling before it hops 
> 
> and just for the record .... if this idea is original
> it will be opensource licensed
> 
> i will now move this topic off this list 
> 
> thank u all 
> 
> D B 
> 
> "my tore up"

Thanks indeed for posting your interesting ideas, but I've just now
beaten you to it, and if you *do* write such a program, my army of
underworked, avaricious lawyers will sue the cr*p out of you, and
you'll be working for me for the rest of your life.

Not a happy prospect, I can assure you.

But all the same, thanks again...


- John
-- 
"Warning: time of day goes back, taking countermeasures."
John Sage
InfoSec Groupie
-
ABCD, EFGH, IJKL, EmEnOh, Pplus+, Mminus-
-
ATTENTION: this message is privileged communication. If you read it
even though you aren't supposed to, you're a poopy-head.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html