[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Verisign abusing .COM/.NET monopoly, BIND releases new

To: Christopher Kruslicky <anub-full.disclosure.200309@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Verisign abusing .COM/.NET monopoly, BIND releases new
From: "Jonathan A. Zdziarski" <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 22:14:25 -0400

Hmm the thought of Verisign blogging domains (even if they do belong to
them) makes me feel wheezy.  Perhaps we should register
verisignsucksdonkeyballs.com and see if it resolved tomorrow?  Seriously
though, this is a very dangerous issue Verisign is walking around.


> And just to make the whole thing a little funnier, they've decided not to 
> resolve verisignsucks.com anymore =)
> 
> $ host verisignsucks.com
> Host verisignsucks.com not found: 2(SERVFAIL)

References:
- [Full-Disclosure] Verisign abusing .COM/.NET monopoly, BIND releases new
  - From: Thor Larholm
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Verisign abusing .COM/.NET monopoly, BIND releases new
  - From: Brian Hatch
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Verisign abusing .COM/.NET monopoly, BIND releases new
  - From: Michael Renzmann
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Verisign abusing .COM/.NET monopoly, BIND releases new
  - From: Christopher Kruslicky

Prev by Date: [Full-Disclosure] G-Con 2 speaker list
Next by Date: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: [RHSA-2003:279-01] Updated OpenSSH packages fix potential vulnerability
Previous by thread: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Verisign abusing .COM/.NET monopoly, BIND releases new
Next by thread: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Verisign abusing .COM/.NET monopoly, BIND releases new
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread