RE: [Full-Disclosure] Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c

["Brown, Rodrick" <rbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sour grapes next time release it to all or keep it to your self. 



-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ferris,
Robin
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 12:54 PM
To: Full-Disclosure
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c

Rox on!

-----Original Message-----
From: Cael Abal [mailto:lists@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 17 September 2003 16:46
To: Full-Disclosure
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c


> frew min ago i was browsing packetstorm and i cant belive my eyes
> anyone has changed a half haeder of my code and disclosures it to 
> packetstorm
> 
> i cant understand why pplz does that
> are they not able to got there own skills
> i have investigate many hours to write this code and it should never 
> released
> but some sucker leaked it and some other gay changes the half haeder
and
> disclosures it
> 
> attached is the ORGINAL EXPLOIT code i wrote months ago

/me blinks

That's so unethical of them!!!

Unfortunately, we have only your word as proof that you were the first
to exploit the xlog off-by-one.  Next time, be the first one to
publically release your exploit to Full-Disclosure, that way you'll be
sure to get credit!

Good luck!

Cael


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html