[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Verisign abusing .COM/.NET monopoly, BIND releases new
- To: "Rainer Gerhards" <rgerhards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Verisign abusing .COM/.NET monopoly, BIND releases new
- From: "Nexus" <nexus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:55:20 +0100
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rainer Gerhards" <rgerhards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[snip]
> I don't like what Verisign does. But localhost.localdomain.com is not a
> safe domain name. I'd recommend either to use one registered to your
> organization or use one of those from
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2606.html. Actually, I would go for ".test".
That's an RFC to be careful of since some numpty decided that
example.com|.org|.net should not only actually resolve, but have some Redhat
box running a webserver answer for it as well. At least it points you to
RFC2606 which I find somewhat ironic. I always used to use example.com for
docs but I can't really anymore though as Rainer said, example.test seems to
be OK.
For now...
Cheers.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html