Re: [Full-Disclosure] new ssh exploit?

[Blue Boar <BlueBoar@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bennett Todd wrote:

> This last one broke my camel's back. OpenSSH sshd begone. And so it
> has. Cool!
<snip>
> Right now I wouldn't run an OpenSSH sshd exposed to the internet;
> lshd is fine there. People who can't get sshv2 clients can go away.

Out of curiosity, what leads you to believe that lshd will be better in 
terms of future bugs vs. OpenSSH?  You specifically mentioned OpenSSL libs 
and SSHv1 support as concerns with OpenSSH.  And sure, it seems unlikely 
that they just got the very last bug.  You also talk about a number of 
libraries needed by lshd, and some other things that aren't quite fully 
implemented in it yet.  Is it just a matter of having some diversity?

					BB

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html