[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] openssh remote exploit
- To: petard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (petard)
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] openssh remote exploit
- From: Darren Reed <avalon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 06:49:30 +1000 (Australia/ACT)
In some mail from petard, sie said:
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 02:41:16AM +1000, Darren Reed wrote:
> DR:> In some mail from auto64746@xxxxxxxxxxxx, sie said:
> [Offtopic] Really, must we politicise everything?! It is
> more informative and equally gender-neutral to state:
> "On <timestamp>, <sender's name/address> wrote:"
I've been using "sie" for more likely longer than you have been using
the Internet so :-P
> [/Offtopic]
>
> DR:> And I'm sure this will manage to be another remote exploit that
> DR:> the OpenBSD team will find a way to not count on their front page.
>
> As far as I can tell, this is another remote exploit that the OpenBSD
> team should not count on their front page. It does not appear to be
> exploitable on OpenBSD in any configuration I have here, and no one
> I've been in communication with has seen any OBSD boxes compromised.
>
> Do you have any knowledge of a working exploit against OpenBSD?
No. Does a vulnerability need an exploit before it becomes a hole ?
Darren
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html