Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Filtering sobig with postfix

[Craig Pratt <craig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday, Aug 20, 2003, at 20:51 US/Pacific, Bojan Zdrnja wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > martin f krafft
> > Sent: Wednesday, 20 August 2003 10:43 p.m.
> > To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Filtering sobig with postfix
> >
> >
> > also sprach vogt@xxxxxxxxxxxx <vogt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > [2003.08.20.1017 +0200]:
> > > in main.cf, enable "body_checks = (filename)". In that (filename)
> > > file, write a regular expression matching sobig, e.g. something
> > > like
> > >
> > > /see attached file for details/	REJECT
> >
> > this incurs a factor 2-4 performance drop, and it could also elicit
> > false positives. you should definitely do more than just REJECT
> > (i.e. write out a message: s/REJECT/554 Suspected virus/).
>
> Yep, as the OP is using postfix, he could use the header_checks 
> directive,
> which can identify MIME headers, so he can easily stop this worm.
> Just check for Content-Disposition header and block everything with 
> .pif in
> filename.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bojan Zdrnja

You'd better check for a lot more than just .pif files. .scr and .exe 
files are critical as well.

And filtering on this stuff is problematic - since there are lots of 
ways to play with MIME headers - such as escaping characters and 
playing with the type fields. Check out Nessus's e-mail tests for some 
examples of the ways to subvert the kind of checks described here. 
You'd better be ready to write a few thousand REs.

If you want to really filter stuff, look at something like MailScanner 
(http://www.mailscanner.info) which has file-type/mime-type checking as 
just the first line of defense. The power and configurability of this 
system is amazing. It works with postfix and sendmail, and lots of 
virus scanners - if you choose to integrate one.

There's definitely a performance cost. But it's very smart about how it 
works - batching scans into a single job. Even if you scan during the 
SMTP exchange, there's going to be a cost. Such is life.

Craig

---
Craig Pratt
Strongbox Network Services Inc.
mailto:craigATstrong-box.net


--
This message checked for dangerous content by MailScanner on StrongBox.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html