[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] 9/11 virus
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] 9/11 virus
- From: l8km7gr02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:19:55 -0400
Have these sorts of articles *ever* done any good?
"The 9/11 virus contains the headline "It's Near 911" or a similar
variation, as well as an attachment labeled "911.jpg." Users should not
open the e-mail or the attached file."
Coaching like this gives precisely the wrong message -- 'Don't open this
specific e-mail or try and view this specific attachment and you'll be
fine!'
Of course, users who regularly send and receive joke/cute file
attachments hardly benefit from the 'Don't open unexpected attachments!'
admonishment.
Add the inevitable batch of new 9/11 viruses to the heap of
avoidable-but-commonplace user-dependent vulnerabilities.
Cael
-------- Original Message --------
Here we go again.. :P
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2003/0904firstofpe.html
By Dan Verton
Computerworld
09/04/03
Antivirus researchers late Wednesday discovered what is being described
as the first of potentially many "9/11" anniversary viruses spreading on
the Internet...
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html