Re: [Full-Disclosure] Should ISPs be blocking open ports for their customers?

["morning_wood" <se_cur_ity@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Should ISPs be blocking open ports for their
customers?


>
> It's not really common practice for transit type providers to do this.
> The networks are typically engineered to forward packets and not filter
> them.  Hopefully the providers have dedicated staff to handle abuse.  In
> that case issues should be handled on a case-by-case basis.

in my local area comcast is blocking 135 and 445, further I have advised comcast
of thinknaw, just dont give it out
 of blocking inbound 6667 as i feel this would reduce many of the mechanisims
using [sd]bot type agents attacking against ircd.
since running a IRC server is in contrast to thier ToS.

DMCA observances:
quote from comcast tv commercial  "download your favorite music, and movie
trailers online"  - - note the use of the phrase "trailers" to note the
destinction between them ( legal ) and full movies ( illegal ), but nothing
about said music ( of which you can get "trailers" of commercial releases (
legal )) as opposed to commercial releases ( illegal ).


Donnie Werner
http://e2-labs.com



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html