Re: [Full-Disclosure] New Microsoft Internet Explorer mshtml.dll Denial of Service?

[Tim <tim-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Even more interesting:
> Received: from netsys.com (NETSYS.COM [199.201.233.10])
>         by phxby.engr.usu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3F11443EF
>         for <irwanhadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue,  2 Sep 2003 02:44:14
> -0600 (MDT)
> Received: from NETSYS.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>         by netsys.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h827wOx20101;
>         Tue, 2 Sep 2003 03:58:24 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from phxby.engr.usu.edu (phxby.engr.usu.edu [129.123.21.101])
>         by netsys.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h827uUE19665
>         for <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 03:56:30
> -0400 (EDT)
> Received: by phxby.engr.usu.edu (Postfix, from userid 501)
>         id 6607B14438C; Tue,  2 Sep 2003 01:56:24 -0600 (MDT)
> 
> I believe that for infosec stuffs, the faster information being
> distributed/sent is the better. Late putting patch just because the
> information come almost 1 hour later after it is sent might be
> catastropic.

I don't know about catastrophic, but it certainly should be faster.  I
personally find the speed of this list unacceptable.  For large lists
with high volume, a list server written in a scripting language like
python isn't going to cut it, IMHO.  I vote for qmail w/ ezmlm(-idx).
(That is, if we get a vote in the matter.)

tim

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html