[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] [LONG] Improving E-mail security...
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] [LONG] Improving E-mail security...
- From: "Schmehl, Paul L" <pauls@utdallas.edu>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:16:32 -0500
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron DuFresne [mailto:dufresne@winternet.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:24 AM
> To: lceone@comcast.net
> Cc: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] [LONG] Improving E-mail security...
>
> Might as well tackle ftp then also.
I don't run ftp on any box I admin. Only sftp.
> Isn't postfix supposed
> to have been such an attempt as to provide something smaller,
> and more stable then sendmail? Although not a rewrite of
> SMTP perse...
Not really. It's designed to be sendmail-compliant and a secure
replacement for sendmail.
Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html