[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Testing Emergency Virus Filter..
- To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Testing Emergency Virus Filter..
- From: Nick FitzGerald <nick@virus-l.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 23:56:16 +1200
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu to me:
> > trouble with it. If your "solution" to this problem is to sugegst that
> > some new file transfer mechanism should be devised and implementations
> > widely distributed, then you will simply move the target of choice for
> > the bad guys from SMTP to "Paul And Richard's Excellent And Easy To Use
> > New File Transfer Protocol"
>
> Why invent a *new* mechanism when one exists?
>
> RFC1440 SIFT/UFT: Sender-Initiated/Unsolicited File Transfer. R. Troth.
> July 1993. (Format: TXT=17366 bytes) (Status: EXPERIMENTAL)
>
> (This was motivated and patterned somewhat like the BITNET 'sendfile'
> facility, and it shows)
Well, I did suggest that it should be widely and commonly deployed (or,
by implication for a new protocol, seem likely to have a chance to be)
_and_ easy for ordinary users to use.
SIFT/UFT would appear to neatly avoid -- almost by design -- both of
those pre-requisites...
Regards,
Nick FitzGerald
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html