[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS should point windowsupdate.com to 127.0.0.1
- To: "Schmehl, Paul L" <pauls@utdallas.edu>, "Jeroen Massar" <jeroen@unfix.org>, "Tobias Oetiker" <oetiker@ee.ethz.ch>, <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS should point windowsupdate.com to 127.0.0.1
- From: "vb" <vb@bitsmart.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 08:39:33 -0400
leave it up. install NAV corporate, run live update to get the latest virus
defs, and, viola....you're done.
vb
> I just curious how you geniuses would solve this problem. You have a
> multi-six figure scientific instrument, which is only manufactured by
> one vendor in the entire world. Your research department depends upon
> that instrument to do research for which they are being funded
> handsomely by grants and expected to produce results.
>
> There's only one problem. The instrument requires that you run Windows
> 2000 Server with IIS, and the vendor requires that you not apply *any*
> patches post SP2. The government certifies the equipment at a certain
> patch level, and if the equipment is patched then the certification no
> longer applies, the research is no longer funded and you are now staring
> a six figure boat anchor.
>
> Given that scenario, please apply your scintillating logic to the
> problem of patching this machine to protect it against threats that were
> discovered *after* SP2.
>
> 1) Minus points if you say "Don't use it." Not an option
> 2) Minus points if you say "Don't allow access to the Internet. It
> *requires* access to the Internet. (IOW, it has to be able to connect
> to "live" IP address ranges, not private IPs.)
> 3) Bonus points if you can figure out how to maintain this machine with
> no interruptions of service and with no breakins.
> 4) Minus points if you say, "I'd patch it anyway. Screw the vendor."
> 5) Double minus points if you say, "I wouldn't work somewhere if they
> had those requirements."
>
> Take your time. I'm not doing much. (I'm not asking for the solution
> either. I already have it. I'm just wondering if you can actually
> think outside the box, or if you're armchair quarterbacks without a
> nickle's worth of actual enterprise experience.)
>
> Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
> Adjunct Information Security Officer
> The University of Texas at Dallas
> AVIEN Founding Member
> http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html