[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS

To: Matthew Murphy <mattmurphy@kc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:37:16 -0400

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 11:39:26 CDT, Matthew Murphy <mattmurphy@kc.rr.com>  said:

> distribution is a *needed* channel.  Of course, if WU gets taken down by the
> floods, we're back at square one, as WU remains the primary distribution
> mechanism for patches to home users.

Nobody gave a shit when windowsupdate.microsoft.com got nailed with CodeRed.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS
  - From: Max Valdez <maxvalde@fis.unam.mx>

References:
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS
  - From: Nick FitzGerald <nick@virus-l.demon.co.uk>
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS
  - From: "Matthew Murphy" <mattmurphy@kc.rr.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [Full-Disclosure] recent RPC/DCOM worm thought
Next by Date: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Blaster: will it spread without tftp?
Prev by thread: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS
Next by thread: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread