[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft urging users to buy Harware Firewalls
- To: "Richard M. Smith" <rms@computerbytesman.com>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft urging users to buy Harware Firewalls
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 22:18:21 -0400
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 20:04:47 EDT, "Richard M. Smith" <rms@computerbytesman.com> said:
> Windows directory from being accessed from the Internet. My only
> question is why aren't NAT routers built into all cable and DSL modems.
Because NAT is *not* a be-all and end-all. NAT *does* break things.
You can't easily do IPSec through a NAT (meaning you need to do some tap-dancing
if you want to VPN from one).
NAT breaks a lot of end-to-end stuff - for instance, if you have a NAT, it's *REALLY*
hard to have 2 different machines running servers on the same port.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3027.txt?number=3027 for all the gory details
PGP signature