(forw) [f0x@squirrelsoup.net: Re: [Full-Disclosure] windowsupdate.com]

[Gabe Arnold <f0x@squirrelsoup.net>]

I think it wouldn,t be a bad idea if in 3 days they pointed windowsupdate to 
127.0.0.1, it's un-professinal, but it would save a lot of traffic.
--Gabe
* KF (dotslash@snosoft.com) wrote:
> Yeah... it worked for you because you did not connect to either of the 
> IP's or hostnames he mentioned...
> 
> www.windowsupdate.com != windowsupdate.com
> 
> -KF
> 
> 
> >>>windowsupdate.com has address 207.46.134.30
> >>>windowsupdate.com has address 207.46.134.94
> >
> >works for me:
> >
> >[as@lonestar ~]# telnet www.windowsupdate.com 80
> >Trying 207.46.134.29...
> >Connected to wu-ori.microsoft.com (207.46.134.29).
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 

----- End forwarded message -----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html