[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-Disclosure] aside: worm vs. worm?
- To: "'Andrew J Homan'" <homa0016@umn.edu>
- Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] aside: worm vs. worm?
- From: "Arian J. Evans" <arian.evans@bigfoot.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 00:29:20 -0500
Andrew,
# Would anyone consider releasing a patching
# worm on their own network if they knew it wouldn't spread to
# the rest of the internet or is there a downside to this notion which I'm
# not realizing?
A worm is a worm is a worm is a worm.
I am most certainly not a big fan of software I can't control,
executing in an arbitrary manner on hosts I hope to control...
I understand what you mean, and where you are going, but
if that is what you want, then I think Microsoft SMS, Shavlik,
Pedestal, and others have highly effective solutions w/out
releasing code that can potentially run in an arbitrary manner...
My $0.01 USD, deprecated for current market value,
Arian J. Evans
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html