On 24.10.2009 20:59, Anton Ivanov wrote:
Given my citation above (I personally use Linux), that obscure test case looks doubtful. If the original reporter uses some patched kernel, that doesn't matter others.Not to tell about that /proc/<PID>/fd/ contains only symbolic links, not files, so I can't understand, how the original reporter managed to gain access to the file in the restricted directory using that symlink.The perms are definitely broken and without a code audit on procfs I would not bet that this is limited just to this rather obscure test case. To be honest, I hope that it is limited to this rather obscure test case. If it is not there may be entertaining ramifications.
-- Sincerely Your, Dan.