[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: Re: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your network?
- To: bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: Re: Re: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your network?
- From: jf <jf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 00:32:07 +0000 (UTC)
sure, of course when you contort reality to where college pranks are the
same as vast corporate conspiracies then im sure you will find plenty of
example, I however meant *real* ones, not what a college student did to
another for fun.
--
Success is not final, failure is not fatal:
it is the courage to continue that counts.
-- Sir Winston Churchill
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Cromar Scott wrote:
> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:34:30 -0500
> From: Cromar Scott <SCromar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: jf <jf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, thefinn12345@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: ***PossibleSPAM*** Re: Re: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how
> many on your network?
>
> Ken Thompson pulled a famous prank back in the old days. He refers to
> it in the following:
>
> http://www.acm.org/classics/sep95/
>
> I've heard a few different versions of this story, some of which would
> fit your requirements.
>
> --Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jf [mailto:jf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 12:28 AM
> To: thefinn12345@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: ***PossibleSPAM*** Re: Re: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how
> many on your network?
>
> > There have also been too many times in the past when they have been
> proven correct to ignore the possibility any longer.
>
> Hi, in what instances has the conjecture that a bug was a deliberate
> backdoor been proven correct?
>
>
>
>
>
> This message may contain information that is confidential or privileged.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately
> and delete this message.
>