[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability
To
: bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
: Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability
From
: Steve Shockley <steve.shockley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:02:12 -0500
Gruzicki Wlodek wrote:
( By default banner hasn't got set suid bit )
Why in the world would someone add a suid bit to banner? Maybe it's a
bug, but you had to work hard to turn it into a vulnerability.
Follow-Ups
:
Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability
From:
admin
References
:
*BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability
From:
Gruzicki Wlodek
Prev by Date:
Secunia Research: PassGo SSO Plus Insecure Default Directory Permissions
Next by Date:
Re: Clarifying integer overflows vs. signedness errors
Previous by thread:
*BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability
Next by thread:
Re: *BSD banner INT overflow vulnerability
Index(es):
Date
Thread