[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On product vulnerability history and vulnerability complexity
- To: Crispin Cowan <crispin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: On product vulnerability history and vulnerability complexity
- From: ArkanoiD <ark@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 19:44:12 +0400
nuqneH,
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 03:00:30PM -0800, Crispin Cowan wrote:
> >
> IMHO the biggest thing that makes Firefox on Linux more secure than IE
> on Windows is that you don't run Firefox as root/administrator, so when
> it gets hacked, it doesn't 0wn the machine.
Actually there is only one major difference: you cannot be rootkited (unless
there is an exploit that fits, and if you are running X11 with all modern
software bells'n'whistles , there probably is) .
From other points of view owning a sole user on the machine does not
differ much.
(Do they still run web browser as administrator? I think XP was designed not
to do that?)