[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords

To: Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, pgsql-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:05:29 -0400

* Bruno Wolff III (bruno@xxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 22:27:01 -0400,
>   Stephen Frost <sfrost@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > SHA2 would also be nice.
> 
> I think the new hash functions are called SHA256 and SHA512.
> For Postgres' purposes the recent weaknesses found in SHA1 and MD5
> aren't a big deal.

Well, alright, SHA256 and SHA512.  It would be nice to have Postgres
support them.

        Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

References:
- Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
  - From: Stephen Frost
- Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
  - From: Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
  - From: Jim C. Nasby
- Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
  - From: Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
  - From: Stephen Frost
- Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
  - From: Bruno Wolff III

Prev by Date: [PLSN-0002] - Multiple vulnerabilities in Gaim
Next by Date: Re: Microsoft Windows image rendering DoS vuln
Previous by thread: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
Next by thread: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread