[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: clamav 0.65 remote DOS exploit

To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: clamav 0.65 remote DOS exploit
From: Mark Renouf <mark@tweakt.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 17:13:44 -0500

Oliver Eikemeier wrote:

0.65 ist the latest stable (release) version, so I guess most production servers would run it, instead of an CVS snapshot.

Are earlier versions than 0.65 affected?

Gentoo's portage tree has 0.60 as latest stable, and 0.65 is in testing (~x86.. masked, but available). Nothing in CVS is allowed into portage.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: clamav 0.65 remote DOS exploit
  - From: Dennis Freise <cat@final-frontier.ath.cx>

References:
- clamav 0.65 remote DOS exploit
  - From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
- Re: clamav 0.65 remote DOS exploit
  - From: Nigel Horne <njh@bandsman.co.uk>
- Re: clamav 0.65 remote DOS exploit
  - From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Round One: "DLL Proxy" Attack Easily Hijacks SSL from Internet Explorer
Next by Date: RE: Round One: "DLL Proxy" Attack Easily Hijacks SSL from Internet Explorer
Previous by thread: Re: clamav 0.65 remote DOS exploit
Next by thread: Re: clamav 0.65 remote DOS exploit
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread